From this point forward, I have no confidence in The Heritage Foundation.
“The high murder rate is almost exclusively cabined in cities run by Democrats and with Democrat district attorneys, many of whom are Soros bought-and-paid-for rogue prosecutors or inspired by Soros, groups like the egregiously misnamed Fair and Just Prosecution and other battering rams of the movement,” they wrote.
With language like that, this doesn’t deserve to be called a “study,” and it certainly doesn’t deserve to be called scholarship.
In any article finding fault with any of these controversial prosecutors, Fox News is sure to include Soros’s name in the headline.
It is nowhere near adequate to merely blame or condemn Soros. On what basis does he fund these candidates? What is their messaging, to move these electorates to vote for them? Certainly there is some philosophy or thought system at work; and, as with any other manifestation of cancel culture, it is nowhere near adequate to condemn or seek to silence (“cancel”) them. Rather, they need to be refuted.
Comments